10 Deductive Essay Topics on Emma Larkin’s #8220;Finding George Orwell in Burma#8221;

10 Deductive Essay Topics on Emma Larkin’s #8220;Finding George Orwell in Burma#8221; If you are looking for facts on Emma Larkins Finding George Orwell in Burma so as to write a deductive essay, there are a handful of great facts from the book which pertain to the book to help you in your writing. These ten facts can prove most useful in helping you to support the claims you might be making in your next essay: In the book â€Å"Finding George Orwell in Burma†, Emma Larkin shows how the government of Burma uses surveillance, censorship, imprisonment, and the rewriting of history to instill fear in its citizens. The government has complete surveillance on its people. The Military Intelligence spies and informers are something spoken about often in the book, something which is so prevalent that people are always afraid to speak out or work with foreigners for fear of being reported to the spies. The emergency provisions act of 1950 provided the government with the ability to sentence any local citizen caught informing foreigners to seven years in prison. This law, and the threat of military intelligence spies contributes even more to the fear of being caught. Fear of having the wrong ideas, of speaking to the wrong person, all of that fear is what breaks apart groups and prevents individuals from sharing their same thoughts or concerns and rising up. When people do rise up, as they did in 1988, the government rewrites history. The generals were rewriting history is a quote from the book which shows how the government rewrote the names of places, streets, buildings, and even disposed of dead bodies and washed away blood from the streets as a way to make all of the people involved in the uprising literally disappear. They did not just kill them, they erased them from history. They erased the memory of the uprising and more. By erasing any evidence of an uprising as well as the evidence of what the government did to those who try to uprising is one of the many ways that the government is able to not only retain fear but use the tool of rewriting history. The Burmese government has a propaganda branch as well as a censorship board both of which work together to produce specific content which has already been approved for magazines as well as newspapers. These two units even create the curriculum for all schools. By censoring all media, the Burmese government is able to maintain complete control of the people by alleviating any potential for motivation or uprisings, and also ensuring that people only hear what the government wants them to hear. By limiting what people have access to, they limit what people think. The government even limited foreign influence. Foreign journalists and writers are not allowed into the country and anyone who has a notebook, camera, or other type of photographic film is continually under surveillance for the duration of their trip. Materials can be reviewed by police as well as military intelligence spies who can delete items that they do not want the individual having. They even have the ability to take away the physical instruments such as a camera and immediately deport the person who owned the camera. If an individual is filming or taking pictures of those locals who are filmed or photographed are also at risk for being detained by police. All of these tools which are used by the government are highly spoken about by Aung San Suu Kyi and reflect strongly on George Orwells contents contained in 1984. Panopticon is the term from George Orwells writing which remains at the center of this type of surveillance. Other terms are also prevalent. Newspeak is a wonderful term which applies to the content distributed by the censorship board. Room 101 refers most strongly to detainees. Another main theme in the writing of George Orwell is out of surveillance. Big brother surveys every aspect of life and infiltrates even the thoughts of its citizens in much the same way that the Burmese do to their people today. Aung San Suu Kyi’s father was a democratic leader of Burma until a coup left him dead. Aung San Suu Kyi took over her father’s role and was soon punished by the military leadership in charge. She married an Englishman and with him had two children, but when she spoke out against the corruption in the government she was placed under house arrest and prohibited not only from seeing her children, but in many cases from having her children visit her. Aung San Suu Kyi was elected in a democratic process once already but the military leadership declared that they were not going to give up their power, after which San Suu Kyi was placed again either in phases of house arrest or would be allowed to leave the country but upon doing so, not allowed back in. She continued to fight alongside her party and to raise international awareness about the seriousness of the human rights abuses. She went on a hunger strike while under house arrest which garnered a great deal of media attention. As of 2015, Burma had open and free elections yet again, and this time Aung San Suu Kyi’s party was elected yet again. The military has stated that it will not contest the results and that it plans to allow the party to assume its role as the new leader. If this takes place, the new party is allowed the authority not only to elect the leader of the country, but other cabinet members. As of late, the former military power changed the constitution to prohibit San Suu Kyi from attaining the role of president, which is a rule that can be overturned if the military leadership keeps to its word and allows the party and San Suu Kyi to assume the power they have been given by their people through the 2015 elections. This book is very interesting to research. That’s why there are also 20 topics on â€Å"Finding Orwell in Burma† by E. Larkin that can be tackled by writing a deductive essay according to our guide. References: Cady, John F.  A history of modern Burma. 1960. Chakraborty, Basanti D. Aung San Suu Kyi.  A Critical Pedagogy of Resistance. SensePublishers, 2013. 121-123. Davison, Peter, Hoepffner Prà ©face de Marie Hermann, and Jean-Jacques Rosat.  George Orwell. Palgrave Macmillan, 1996. Harvey, Godfrey Eric.  History of Burma. Asian Educational Services, 2000. Kyi, Aung San Suu.  Aung San Suu Kyi. 1989. Kyi, Aung San Suu. Freedom from fear.  Index on Censorship  21.1 (1992): 11-30. Kyi, Aung San Suu. Voice of hope.  Index on Censorship  26.3 (1997): 162-168.

Caprivis new course Essays - Zambezi Region, German Empire

Caprivi's new course Essays - Zambezi Region, German Empire Caprivi's new course Caprivi?s new course The Kaiser had been so taken by the success of tariff reform that Caprivi had been given the noble title of count. However, powerful voices quickly and effectively raised doubts: Court conservatives. To start with, Wilhelm 11 himself backed Caprivi?s social policy in the belief that the improvements would discourage people from supporting the socialists. Yet, Wilhelm 11 sympathy began to wane and many of Wilhelm?s advisers at court disagreed with caprivi?s socialist policies. Some encouraged the Kaiser to ditch him and to assume a more authoritarian personal rule. Moving on and the landowners were deeply upset by the commercial treaties since they threatened to reduce their profits. In 1893 the Agrarian league was formed to put pressure on parliament and to win support and privileges for landowners. It quickly grew into an effective and well organised lobby of a third of a million members that acted as a powerful pressure group on behalf of the conservative parties. Finally in 1893 t here had been resentment in military circles when Caprivi made concessions over the army Bill in the Reichstag by reducing the length of conscription for national service from three years to two. The army bill was actually rejected, resulting in the Reichstag being dissolved and the following election brought things to a head. There were conservative concerns about anarchist outrages across Europe and the increase in the total number of social democrat seats to 44. Opponents of Caprivi now reinforced Wilhelm11 own doubts about his chancellor?s suitability for office and Wilhelm11 pressed Caprivi to draw up an anti-socialist subversion bill. The chancellor refused and this led to an extraordinary plan by Wilhelm11 and his supporter Eulenburg. Their plan was to set aside the powers of the Reichstag, crush socialism and establish a more authoritarian system centred on the Kaiser himself. This was the final straw for caprivi. He successfully talked the Kaiser out of such a course of act ion, but he had lost the will to carry on. In October 1894 caprivi resigned and gladly retired from the political scene. Caprivi?s four years as chancellor neatly illustrate the difficulties of trying to cope with the pressures of the various political forces in imperial Germany. In his attempt to create a genuine base of parliamentary support for the government, Caprivi showed his understanding of the need, in a modern industrial society, for a political approach that recognised the concerns and aspirations of the mass of the population. However, Caprivi?s new course foundered because it was opposed to established forces of power and influence. He was subjected to considerable abuse from the conservative press and he was the focus of opposition intrigue at court. In the end, he could not rely on the consistent support of the Kaiser whose delusions of greatness were now taken up with thoughts of personal rule and weltpolitik.

World Depression Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

World Depression - Research Paper Example It has been argued that just after the World War 1, the old European World Order actually failed to create an equitable and wise order to ensure peaceful settlements between the nations. The war has taken its toll on the respective economies of the European countries also as besides losing millions of soldiers and civilians, European economies suffered due to lack of economic growth and prosperity. This started to further worsen when world economy started to suffer due to the collapse of the US economy. The crash of US Stock Market during October 1929 started a chain reaction of economic downturns at the global level where industrialized countries started to face the similar decline in economic activity. Germany especially felt the most of the brunt as it was not only devastated by war but by low economic output and slow growth too. Since most of the money borrowed to finance the war came from US therefore the overall economic consequences of this have been harsh at the global level. What caused this recession, the effects it left on the global economy and whether this event led to the second World War are some of the questions which will be discussed in this paper. Great Depression It has been unanimously accepted that the Great Depression started with the collapse of US Stock market. ... (Bentley, Ziegler and Streets-Salter.) It is critical to note that US was the largest lender during the World War 1 and many allies countries have extensively borrowed from US. In the aftermath of the recession in US and the failure of the financial institutions, banks in US started to call their loans thus putting pressure on already devastated economies of Europe. These actions therefore created a strong chain reaction of economic downturn at the global level thus creating a global recession. (Ludlam) Many also argue that the rise of economic distress also allowed the rise of Fascism within the European block and aroused the sentiments which finally led to the World War 2. World War II and Great Depression The decline in the economic activity as well as the rising inequality within Europe due to economic crisis has allowed rulers like Hitler to dominate the policy making arena within Europe. People were miserably exhausted not only by the World War 1 but by the economic collapse of these countries also. The spread of the global recession therefore slowly and gradually led to the march towards the Second World War. (Garraty) Though the economic slowdown has allowed rulers like Hitler to rise and dominate however the World War II could have been averted probably with the help of collaborative economic approach where the political solution of the problem could have been sought. During that era, US largely remained neutral however; it continued to provide supplies as well as other support to the allies. If during that era, US has maintained its neutral stance for longer and without actually discriminating between the nations, the